Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gussie Stowasser, Respondent, v. Sherman Outfitting Company, Appellant, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
General
Gussie Stowasser, Respondent, v. Sherman Outfitting Company, Appellant
168 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gussie Stowasser, Respondent, v. Sherman Outfitting Company, Appellant.
Stowasser v. Sherman Outfitting Go., 46 App. Div. 623. affirmed.
(Argued October 4, 1901;
decided November 12, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 22, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and' an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Maxwell Davidson and Samuel Greenbaum for appellant.
Otto Uorwitz for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs and ten per cent damages, under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin,'Yann and Landon, JJ.