Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis G. Hall, Appellant, v. William Erwin, Respondent, 1874 — 57 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Francis G. Hall, Appellant, v. William Erwin, Respondent
57 N.Y. 643·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis G. Hall, Appellant, v. William Erwin, Respondent.
(Argued October 2, 1873;
decided January term, 1874.)
In this ease, the judgment of the trial court was for plaintiff. The General Term reversed the judgment, and directed final judgment for defendant. Held, that the case was not one wherein under no condition of facts could the plaintiff recover, and that the judgment of reversal should have granted a new trial, and judgment so modified.
E. H. Benn for the appellant.
R. King for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Lott, Ch. C., and Reynolds, C.,]
Lott, Ch. C., and Reynolds, C.,
read for modification of. judgment, so as to grant a new trial.
All concur; Gray, C., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.