Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel T. O'Brien, as Administrator of the Estate of Ann Coote, Appellant, v. The Williamsburg Savings Bank et al., Respondents, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 546 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel T. O'Brien, as Administrator of the Estate of Ann Coote, Appellant, v. The Williamsburg Savings Bank et al., Respondents
181 N.Y. 546·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel T. O’Brien, as Administrator of the Estate of Ann Coote, Appellant, v. The Williamsburg Savings Bank et al., Respondents.
Coote v. Coote, 93 App. Div. 613, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 10, 1905;
decided April 18, 1905.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. ' . •'
The motion was made upon the ground that no appeal lay to the Court of Appeals as matter of right from the judgment appealed from, and permission to appeal had not been granted.
George Tompkins for motion.
Daniel T. O'Brien opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs of appeal, but without costs of motion.