Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GREATER CITY SURETY & INDEMNITY CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES of America, 1932 — 62 F.2d 1072 · caselaw · US
Corporations
GREATER CITY SURETY & INDEMNITY CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES of America
62 F.2d 1072·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Before ALSCHÜLER and EYANS, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GREATER CITY SURETY & INDEMNITY CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 4763.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1932.
George K. Bowden, of Chicago, HI., for appellant.
Dwight H. Green, U. S. Atty., of Chicago, 111.
Before ALSCHÜLER and EYANS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulation of counsel filed this day, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, without costs. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.