Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. v. BROWN et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 222 · caselaw · US
General
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. v. BROWN et al.
393 U.S. 222·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. v. BROWN et al.
No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.
Daniel B. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 563. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563.
Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Poliak for appellee United States in both cases.
Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.