Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Propper, Receiver, v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, 1952 — 342 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Propper, Receiver, v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
342 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of- this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 390,
October Term, 1948.
Propper, Receiver, v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian,
[MAJORITY]
337 U. S. 472. The motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing is denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of- this motion.