Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nilva v. United States; Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.; Radovich v. National Football League et al.; Schyman v. Department of Registration and Education of Illinois et al.; Clark v. Illinois; Federika et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Cooper v. United States; Poliafico et al. v. United States; Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee, et al.; Dopkowski v. Ragen, Warden, 1957 — 353 U.S. 931 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Nilva v. United States; Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.; Radovich v. National Football League et al.; Schyman v. Department of Registration and Education of Illinois et al.; Clark v. Illinois; Federika et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Cooper v. United States; Poliafico et al. v. United States; Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee, et al.; Dopkowski v. Ragen, Warden
353 U.S. 931·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 37.
No. 62.
No. 94.
No. 639.
No. 651.
No. 687.
No. 698.
No. 701.
No. 714.
No. 11,
Nilva v. United States, Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp., Radovich v. National Football League et al., Schyman v. Department of Registration and Education of Illinois et al., Clark v. Illinois, Federika et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cooper v. United States, Poliafico et al. v. United States, Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee, et al., Dopkowski v. Ragen, Warden,
Misc.
[MAJORITY]
352 U. S. 385;
352 U. S. 370;
352 U. S. 445;
352 U. S. 1001;
352 U. S. 1002;
352 U. S. 1025;
352 U. S.. 1026;
352 U. S. 1025;
352 U. S. 1031; and
352 U. S. 1031. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.