Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. VAAGE et al., 1968 — 390 U.S. 714 · caselaw · US
General
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. VAAGE et al.
390 U.S. 714·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. VAAGE et al.
No. 1177.
Decided April 22, 1968.
Charles C. Pillon and Thomas A. Ziebarth for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Joel Lewittes, Assistant Attorney General, for appel-lees Rockefeller et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.