Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of THE Steamship SILARUS and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Libelant-Appellee, v. COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Respondent-Appellant; COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Cross-Libelant-Appellant, v. The ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of The Steamship Silarus and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Cross-Respondent-Appellee, 1932 — 55 F.2d 1082 · caselaw · US
General
ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of THE Steamship SILARUS and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Libelant-Appellee, v. COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Respondent-Appellant; COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Cross-Libelant-Appellant, v. The ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of The Steamship Silarus and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Cross-Respondent-Appellee
55 F.2d 1082·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of THE Steamship SILARUS and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Libelant-Appellee, v. COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Respondent-Appellant. COMPANHIA DE NAVEGACAO LLOYD BRAZILEIRO, Cross-Libelant-Appellant, v. The ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Owner of The Steamship Silarus and as Bailee of Her Cargo, Cross-Respondent-Appellee.
No. 163.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 1, 1932.
See, also, 27 F.(2d) 1002; 31 F.(2d) 757.
Purrington & McConnell, of New York City (Frank J. McConnell and James D. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for Compartida de Navegaeao.
Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, dark & Hupper, of New York City (Van Veehten Veeder, Chauneey I. Clark, and A. Howard Neely, all of New York City, of counsel), for Royal Mail Steam Packet.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree [50 F.(2d) 207] affirmed.