Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick J. Frowein et al., Appellants, v. Moses Lindheim, Respondent, 1891 — 126 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick J. Frowein et al., Appellants, v. Moses Lindheim, Respondent
126 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick J. Frowein et al., Appellants, v. Moses Lindheim, Respondent.
(Submitted April 13, 1891;
decided April 28, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme • Court in the first judicial department, made, the first Monday •of October 1890, which affirmed an order of. Special Term granting defendant discovery of plaintiffs’ books to enable .him to frame his answer.
Geo. W. Wiokersham for appellants.
Emmvuel J. Myers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.