Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Henry Hull, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants. (Two actions.), 1896 — 149 N.Y. 590 · caselaw · US
General
John Henry Hull, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants. (Two actions.)
149 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Henry Hull, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants. (Two actions.)
Hull v. N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 616, affirmed.
(Argued April 21, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from two judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon orders made May 18, 1894, which affirmed judgments in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
J. Crawford Thomson for appellants.
John Henry Hull, respondent, in person.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.