Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al. v. Rychlik, 1956 — 352 U.S. 877 · caselaw · US
General
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al. v. Rychlik
352 U.S. 877·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 56.
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al. v. Rychlik.
Clarence E. Weisell and Harold N. McLaughlin for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr. and Richard R. Lyman for the Railway Labor Executives’ Association.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 351 U. S. 930, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motions for leave to file briefs of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Railway Labor Executives’ Association, as amici curiae, are granted.