Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans' Bureau, and James W. Good, Secretary of War, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Robert C. EASTON, Appellee, 1930 — 39 F.2d 519 · caselaw · US
General
Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans' Bureau, and James W. Good, Secretary of War, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Robert C. EASTON, Appellee
39 F.2d 519·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, and James W. Good, Secretary of War, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Robert C. EASTON, Appellee.
No. 5034.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Argued Jan. 7, 1930.
Reargued Feb. 3, 1930.
Decided March 3, 1930.
Leo A. Rover and W. W. Smith, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
E. S. Bailey and S. T. Ansell, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
R. L. Golze and O. R. McGuire, both of Washington, D. C., amicus eurise, for the Comptroller General.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and "VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
The facts in this case are not •materially different from those in the case just decided, 59 App. D. C. 267, 39 F.(2d) 517. For reasons stated in the opinion in that ease, the judgment in this also is similarly modified and, as modified, affirmed.
Affirmed, as modified.