General
Eppens, Smith & Wiemann Company, Respondent, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellant
188 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eppens, Smith & Wiemann Company, Respondent, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 12, 1907;
decided April 30, 1907.)
Eppens, Smith & Wiemann Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 113 App. Div. 900, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 27, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover an amount alleged to be due under a policy of fire insurance.
Raymond Rubenstein and Edgar J. Nathan for appellant.
Arnold L. Davis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett Haight, Yann, Hisoocii and Chase, JJ.