Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent
176 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent.
City of Buffalo v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co., 68 App. Div. 488, appeal withdrawn.
(Argued November 16, 1903;
decided November 17, 1903.)
Motion to withdraw part of appeal from judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 19,1902, which affirmed so much of a judgment of the court on trial at an Equity Term as was in favor of the defendant and reversed so much of said judgment as was in favor of plaintiff and granted a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal from that part of the judgment reversing on the law and the facts and granting a new trial was taken inadvertently, plaintiff’s counsel not having in mind the provision of law that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to review where disputed questions of law are involved.
Charles L. Feldman, Corporation Counsel {Edward L. Jv/ng of counsel), for motion.
John G. Milburn opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted upon payment of $150, and the argument of the appeal remaining in this court is set down for the third Monday of January next.