Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hannah Nirdlinger et al., Plaintiffs, v. Meyer A. Bernheimer et al., Executors of Isaac Bernheimer, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Augusta Nirdlinger et al., Appellants, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
General
Hannah Nirdlinger et al., Plaintiffs, v. Meyer A. Bernheimer et al., Executors of Isaac Bernheimer, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Augusta Nirdlinger et al., Appellants
153 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hannah Nirdlinger et al., Plaintiffs, v. Meyer A. Bernheimer et al., Executors of Isaac Bernheimer, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Augusta Nirdlinger et al., Appellants.
Nirdlinger v. Bernheimer, 90 Hun, 290, affirmed.
(Argued April 21, 1897;
decided May 11, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 25, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
James Break Perkins and L. If. Uinde for appellants.
George If. Yeoman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.