Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth J. Webber, Respondent, v. John N. Lester et al., Appellants, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 742 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth J. Webber, Respondent, v. John N. Lester et al., Appellants
125 N.Y. 742·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth J. Webber, Respondent, v. John N. Lester et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 21, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 25, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Tracy G. Becker for appellants.
George Wadsworth for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Dahtels, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.