Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Monsanto Co. et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.; and Rotary Drilling Services, Inc., et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc., 1968 — 390 U.S. 904 · caselaw · US
General
Monsanto Co. et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.; and Rotary Drilling Services, Inc., et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.
390 U.S. 904·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 841.
No. 842.
Monsanto Co. et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.; and Rotary Drilling Services, Inc., et al. v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.
R. Gordon Gooch for petitioner Monsanto Co., and Vernon O. Teofan and Jack N. Price for respondent in No. 841. James R. Ryan for petitioners in No. 842.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Reported below: 383 F. 2d 97.