General
York & Whitney Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company
239 U.S. 631·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 62.
York & Whitney Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company.
In error to the Superior Court of the State of Massachusetts.
Argued November 8, 1915.
Decided November 29, 1915.
Mr. Amos L. Taylor for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. John L. Hall for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the. want of jurisdiction upon, the authority of (1) Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; The Mellon Company v. McCafferty, this day decided, ante, p. 134; (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; see Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98, and cases cited.