Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rose M. Finigan, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent
192 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rose M. Finigan, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
People ex rel. Finigan v. Board of Education, 106 App. Div. 101, affirmed.
(Argued May 19, 1908;
decided June 2, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 9, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term quashing an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to reinstate the relator in the position of teacher in the public schools of the city of New York.
David Ross for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Thomas F. Noonan of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.