Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Amos W. Wright et al., as Executors of Mary W. Wright, Deceased, Respondents, v. Frederick W. Wright et al., Appellants, 1907 — 190 N.Y. 549 · caselaw · US
General
Amos W. Wright et al., as Executors of Mary W. Wright, Deceased, Respondents, v. Frederick W. Wright et al., Appellants
190 N.Y. 549·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Amos W. Wright et al., as Executors of Mary W. Wright, Deceased, Respondents, v. Frederick W. Wright et al., Appellants.
Wright v. Wright, 114 App. Div. 900, affirmed.
(Argued December 9, 1907;
decided December 20, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 12, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for the construction of a will.
Jacob Maries and William Z. Lamed for appellants.
Wilson M. Powell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment •affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Wernee, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.