Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEE MEE CHUN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee, 1929 — 34 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
LEE MEE CHUN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee
34 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEE MEE CHUN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
August 19, 1929.
No. 2380.
E. F. Damon, of Boston, Mass., for appellant.
Frederick H. Tarr, U. S. Atty., and John W. Schenck, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of appellee, case docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution.