Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lynch v. Wood, 1788 — 1 U.S. 310 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Lynch v. Wood
1 U.S. 3101 Dall. 310·Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lynch v. Wood.
Costs of a commission.
Levy exhibited an account of expenses in the execution of a commission,
which had issued for the plaintiff, ex parte, and moved that they might be allowed in the costs.
Besides the charges for swearing the witnesses, and their attendance on the commissioners, there were charges for agency, and for the expenses of travelling to collect the testimony.
[MAJORITY]
The Court allowed the charges for swearing the witnesses, and for their attendance ; but rejected those for agency and travelling.