Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward J. McKeever et al., Appellants, v. Theodore B. Willis, as Commissioner of City Works of the City of Brooklyn, Respondent. In the Matter of the Application of Edward J. McKeever, for a Writ of Certiorari, Appellant, 1896 — 151 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward J. McKeever et al., Appellants, v. Theodore B. Willis, as Commissioner of City Works of the City of Brooklyn, Respondent. In the Matter of the Application of Edward J. McKeever, for a Writ of Certiorari, Appellant
151 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward J. McKeever et al., Appellants, v. Theodore B. Willis, as Commissioner of City Works of the City of Brooklyn, Respondent. In the Matter of the Application of Edward J. McKeever, for a Writ of Certiorari, Appellant.
People ex rel. McKeever v. Willis, 6 App. Div. 281, and In re Appn. McKeever, 6 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
(Argued November 30, 1896;
decided December 15, 1896.)
Appeals from two orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 19, 1896, one of which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel respondent to award to relators a contract for cleaning the streets of the city of Brooklyn, and the other affirmed an order of the Special Term denying an application for a writ of certiorari.
Almet F. Jenks and Jerry A. Weinberg for appellants.
Joseph A. Burr for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Orders affirmed, on the construction given to the charter by the courts below, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.