General
McKENZIE ENGRAVING CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Harold B. CANAVELLO, Defendant in Error
25 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McKENZIE ENGRAVING CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Harold B. CANAVELLO, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 9, 1928.
No. 221.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York,
Spence, Hopkins & Walser, of New York City (Hamilton Hicks, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Stewart Maurice, of New York City, for defendant in error.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.