Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 888 · caselaw · US
General
Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al.
352 U.S. 888·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 362.
Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al.
Calvin L. Rampton for appellants. E.R. Callister, Attorney General of Utah, and Raymond W. Gee, Assistant Attorney General, for the Public Service Commission of Utah, appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Elmer B. Collins, Bryan P. Leverich, Ernest P. Porter and Wood R. Worsley for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Probable jurisdiction noted.