Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catherine McCann, as Administratrix of Simon McCann, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York and Queens County Railway Company, Appellant, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
General
Catherine McCann, as Administratrix of Simon McCann, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York and Queens County Railway Company, Appellant
172 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine McCann, as Administratrix of Simon McCann, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York and Queens County Railway Company, Appellant.
McCann v. N. Y. & Queens Co. Ry. Co. 73 App. Div. 305, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 6, 1902;
decided October 7, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made at the June term 1902, which reversed a judgment of the trial court setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial, and directed judgment upon the verdict.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Michael P. <9’ Gomior for motion.
William E. Stewa/rt opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.