General
Florence Nunnally, Respondent, v. The Tribune Association, Appellant
186 N.Y. 533·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence Nunnally, Respondent, v. The Tribune Association, Appellant.
Nunnally v. Tribune Association, 111 App. Div. 485, affirmed.
(Argued October 1, 1906;
decided October 16, 1906.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 9, 1906, which affirmed an interlocutory-judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action for libel.
The following question was certified : “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
Henry W. SaoJceit and Edward L. Stevens for appellant.
George II. D. Foster for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Patterson, J. below ; question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.