General
The Union Dime Savings Institution of the city of New York, Respondent, v. Francis Neppert, Impleaded, etc., Appellant; The Same, Respondent, v. Florence Felt, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
123 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Union Dime Savings Institution of the city of New York, Respondent, v. Francis Neppert, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. The Same, Respondent, v. Florence Felt, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 12, 1890;
decided October 7, 1890.)
Appeals from orders of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 28,1889,-which reversed judgments in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial.
Theodore De Witt for appellants.
William H. Arnoux for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against defendants on stipulation.