Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas J. Morrell et al., Appellants, v. The North Second Street and Middle Village Railroad Company, Respondent, 1875 — 63 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas J. Morrell et al., Appellants, v. The North Second Street and Middle Village Railroad Company, Respondent
63 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas J. Morrell et al., Appellants, v. The North Second Street and Middle Village Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued November 33, 1875;
decided November 30, 1875.)
Oscar H. Stearns for the appellants.
D. T. Waldron for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.