General
Dixie MACK, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES
2 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dixie MACK, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
June 10, 1924.)
No. 6330.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.
Lloyd A. Magney and E: D. O’Sullivan, both of Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff in error.
James C. Kinsler, U. S. Atty., and George A. Keyser, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Omaha, Neb.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of defendant in error, under rule 24.