Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
The Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
166 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Rochester Folding Box Co. v. Browne, 55 App. Div. 444, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 15, 1901;
decided April 23, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiff and from a judgment of the Appellate Division in the fourth judicial department, entered November 24, 1900, affirming said judgment, entered upon a decision of the court .on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to review the interlocutory judgment from which the appeal is taken.
Elbridge L. Adams for motion.
C. D. Kiehel opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion, granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.