Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moses W. Taylor, Appellant, v. Emil Klein, Respondent, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 571 · caselaw · US
General
Moses W. Taylor, Appellant, v. Emil Klein, Respondent
170 N.Y. 571·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moses W. Taylor, Appellant, v. Emil Klein, Respondent.
Taylor v. Klein, 47 App. Div. 343, affirmed.
(Submitted January 20, 1902;
decided February 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 6, 1900, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy under sections 1279, 1281 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Platt & Thompson for appellant.
John Frarihc:ihei/mer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Mabtin, Yann and Webneb, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.