Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Gramercy Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 709 · caselaw · US
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Gramercy Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent
158 N.Y. 709·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except O’Brien, J., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Gramercy Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.
(Argued February 27, 1899;
decided March 14, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 13, 1896, affirming on certiorari a determination of the state comptroller in assessing a franchise tax against relator.
People ex rel. Gramercy Co. v. Roberts, 91 Hun, 146, affirmed.
Fisher A. Baker for appellant.
John G. Davies, Attorney-General, and G. D. B. Hasbrouok, Deputy Attorney-General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., dissenting.