Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company, Respondent, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company, Respondent
139 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued October 10, 1893;
decided October 24, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the-Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 13, 1892, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions and directed judgment in favor of defendant upon a verdict directed by the court.
Devoid J. Dean for appellant.
Henry H. Anderson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.