Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Christian Eberspacher, Appellant, v. Leopold Bohm, Respondent, 1891 — 126 N.Y. 678 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Christian Eberspacher, Appellant, v. Leopold Bohm, Respondent
126 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Christian Eberspacher, Appellant, v. Leopold Bohm, Respondent.
(Submitted April 27, 1891;
decided June 2, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made at the October Term, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing a judgment in favor of plaintiff to he canceled and discharged of record, because of the discharge of the defendant in bankruptcy.
Fdward W. 8. Johnston for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on default of appearance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.