Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Proctor H. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Taliaferro, and J. Franklin Bell, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Hugh McDERMOTT, Appellee, 1928 — 30 F.2d 474 · caselaw · US
General
Proctor H. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Taliaferro, and J. Franklin Bell, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Hugh McDERMOTT, Appellee
30 F.2d 474·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Proctor H. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Taliaferro, and J. Franklin Bell, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Hugh McDERMOTT, Appellee.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Submitted November 7, 1928.
Decided January 7, 1929.
No. 4810.
Wm. W. Bride and F. H. Stephens, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
W. Glynn Gardiner and South Trimble, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and RO'BB and YAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the" District in a mandamus proceeding growing out of substantially the same facts and involving the same questions that were involved in the ease just decided. 58 App. D. C. 308, 30 F.(2d) 471.
For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.