Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Koons et al., Appellants, v. Andrew N. Martin, Respondent., 1894 — 143 N.Y. 672 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob Koons et al., Appellants, v. Andrew N. Martin, Respondent.
143 N.Y. 672·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob Koons et al., Appellants, v. Andrew N. Martin, Respondent.
(Submitted October 18, 1894;
decided November 2, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made February 8, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the County Court of Monroe county on trial without a jury and granted a new trial.
M. F. McMath, for appellants.
John J. Snell for respondent.
Reported below, 66 Hun, 554.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.