Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. J. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Mrs. J. J. (Lois) PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
J. J. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Mrs. J. J. (Lois) PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
75 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. J. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Mrs. J. J. (Lois) PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 7747.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 5, 1935.
Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for petitioners.
Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIB-LEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These causes came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that the above entitled and numbered causes be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, and was submitted to the court.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the above entitled and numbered causes be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, with instructions to allow to the petitioners depletion on the oil and gas lease bonuses received by them in the year 1927, for leases relating to land in Wheeler county and to portions of the Woodrum Ranch, in accordance with the principles announced in Herring v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 293 U. S. 322, 55 S. Ct. 179, 79 L. Ed. ——. It is further ordered and adjudged that the mandate of this court issue without delay.