Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth S. Van Beuren et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Lazarus et al., Appellants, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 583 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth S. Van Beuren et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Lazarus et al., Appellants
164 N.Y. 583·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth S. Van Beuren et al., Respondents, v. Sarah Lazarus et al., Appellants.
Van Beuren v. Lamrm, 22 App. Div. 628, modified.
(Argued May 9, 1900;
decided June 12, 1900;
motion for reargument submitted October 1, 1900;
denied October 23, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial' department, entered November 22, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Nelson S. Spencer for appellants.
William Mitchell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The judgment of the Appellate Division reversing the first judgment of the Special Term reversed, the subsequent proceedings and judgment set aside and the said judgment of the Special Term affirmed, with costs to the defendants of all the proceedings in all courts, unless the plaintiffs stipulate to modify the judgment appealed from so as to direct that the plaintiffs pay to the defendants $13,600, with interest thereon from March 1,1897, with costs to the defendants in all courts. If they shall so stipulate, then the judgment appealed from is modified in accordance with such stipulation, and as so modified affirmed upon opinion in Van Beuren v. Wotherspoon (164 N. Y. 368).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., G-ray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.