General
Kensington National Bank, Respondent, v. Charles T. Henry, Appellant
185 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kensington National Bank, Respondent, v. Charles T. Henry, Appellant.
Kensington Nat. Bank v. Henry, 104 App. Div. 619, affirmed.
(Submitted May 18, 1906;
decided June 12, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May G, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover' upon a proinissorynote dated and made payable at New York, but actually made and delivered at Philadelphia.
Gilbert W. Minor for appellant.
Daniel P. Hays and Joseph J. Corn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ.