Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac B. Canfield, Respondent, v. Andrew X. Fallon et al., Executors of Julia F. Mansfield, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Catharine E. Gulbrandsen et al., Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac B. Canfield, Respondent, v. Andrew X. Fallon et al., Executors of Julia F. Mansfield, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Catharine E. Gulbrandsen et al., Appellants
162 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac B. Canfield, Respondent, v. Andrew X. Fallon et al., Executors of Julia F. Mansfield, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Catharine E. Gulbrandsen et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 26, 1900;
decided March 6, 1900.)
Motions to allow separate bills of costs to the several respondents. (See 161 N. Y. 623.)
[MAJORITY]
Remittitur ordered amended so as to allow a bill of costs to the guardian ad litem of the infant defendants, Calantha, Arthur, Lloyd, Florence and Isaac Canfield ; the other motions for separate costs are denied.