Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martha E. Seymour, Appellant, v. The Spring Forest Cemetery Association et al., Respondents, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 697 · caselaw · US
General
Martha E. Seymour, Appellant, v. The Spring Forest Cemetery Association et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 697·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martha E. Seymour, Appellant, v. The Spring Forest Cemetery Association et al., Respondents.
Seymour v. Spi'ing Forest Cemetery Assn., 4 App. Biv. 359, affirmed
(Argued October 25, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 18, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
Edtoard K. Clark for appellant.
Israel T. Deyo and II. Fred Lyon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J., not sitting.