Contracts · MBE-tested
Prebyl v. Prudential Insurance Co. et al.
320 U.S. 208·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1064.
Prebyl v. Prudential Insurance Co. et al.
June 21, 1943.
Milton Pre-byl, pro se.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.