Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
California Consolidated Mining Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Manley, Sheriff of Shoshone County, State of Idaho, et al., 1906 — 203 U.S. 579 · caselaw · US
General
California Consolidated Mining Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Manley, Sheriff of Shoshone County, State of Idaho, et al.
203 U.S. 579·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 148.
California Consolidated Mining Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Manley, Sheriff of Shoshone County, State of Idaho, et al.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 15, 1906.
Decided October 22, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskirk, 3 Wall. 448; Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, Mo. (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541, 544.
Mr. Myron A. Folsom for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Forney for defendants in error.