Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jane H. Kellogg, Appellant, v. Jacob Stout et al., Respondents, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 647 · caselaw · US
General
Jane H. Kellogg, Appellant, v. Jacob Stout et al., Respondents
109 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jane H. Kellogg, Appellant, v. Jacob Stout et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 9, 1888;
decided April 24, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of Hew York, entered upon an order made March 10, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered on a verdict.
T. C. Cronin for appellant.
Alfred Jaretski for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All'concur.
Judgment affirmed.