Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Carroll Construction Co. et al.
346 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 49.
United States v. Carroll Construction Co. et al.
Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of United States v. Gilbert Associates, 345 U. S. 361.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson dissent.
They are of the opinion that United States v. Gilbert Associates is not pertinent.