Criminal Law · MBE-tested
In the Matter of Monte J. MORRIS, Esq. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant
521 F.2d 794·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Monte J. MORRIS, Esq. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 75-1402.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 8, 1975.
Monte J. Morris (argued), Henderson, Nev., for defendant-appellant.
Daniel Henry, Asst. U. S. Atty. (appeared), Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.
The Honorable James A. von der Heydt, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
After a hearing Monte J. Morris, counsel of record for appellant, is assessed a penalty of three hundred dollars, under Rule 46(c), F.R.A.P., for failure to prosecute this criminal appeal with due diligence.
Payment is to be made to the Clerk of this Court within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order. The payment, in due course, will be transmitted to the Treasurer of the United States.