Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Amelia M. Appel, as Administratrix of Joseph M. Appel, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Ætna Life Insurance Company, Respondent, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 514 · caselaw · US
General
Amelia M. Appel, as Administratrix of Joseph M. Appel, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Ætna Life Insurance Company, Respondent
180 N.Y. 514·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Amelia M. Appel, as Administratrix of Joseph M. Appel, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Ætna Life Insurance Company, Respondent.
Appel v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 86 App. Div. 83, affirmed.
(Argued December 1, 1904;
decided December 16, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 24, 1903, sustaining defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, and granting a motion for a new trial.
Charles Van Voorhis for appellant.
Charles J. Bissell and Joseph W. Taylor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haigíht, Martin and Vann, J J.