Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paul, Director of Department of Agriculture of California, et al. v. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al., 1962 — 368 U.S. 965 · caselaw · US
General
Paul, Director of Department of Agriculture of California, et al. v. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al.
368 U.S. 965·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 599.
Paul, Director of Department of Agriculture of California, et al. v. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Walter S. Rountree, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence E. Doxsee and John Fourt, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants. Isaac E. Ferguson for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Probable jurisdiction noted.